1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 269 Cal.App.2d
  5. 269 Cal.App.2d 803 (1969)
 

SUSMAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 32056.

269 Cal.App.2d 803 (1969)

75 Cal. Rptr. 240

I.B. SUSMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 18, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Long & Levit, Bert W. Levit, John B. Hook, Gregory Archbald and Ronald E. Mallen for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Marvin Goldsmith and Robert H. O'Brien, Deputy Attorneys General, Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, John A. Daly, Assistant City Attorney, Arthur Y. Honda and Nowland C. Hong, Deputy City Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents.

FORD, P.J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of dismissal entered after the general demurrers of the defendants City of Los Angeles and State of California to the plaintiffs' complaint as amended had been sustained with leave to amend (see rule 202(e), Cal. Rules of Court) and the plaintiffs had elected not to file another amended pleading. The action relates to the "Watts' Riot" of 1965.

In paragraph VIII of the first cause of action it was alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases