CLAIROL INCORPORATED v. F. T. C.

No. 21235.

410 F.2d 647 (1969)

CLAIROL INCORPORATED, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

April 2, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert H. Weil (argued) of Weil & Lee, New York City, Landels, Ripley, Gregory & Diamond, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Emerson Elkins, Washington, D. C. (argued), James McI. Henderson, Gen. Counsel, J. B. Truly, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.


MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner, Clairol Incorporated, seeks review of a cease and desist order entered by the Federal Trade Commission. The Commission has found that in two respects Clairol, in making promotional payments, discriminates between competing customers in violation of § 2(d) of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(d).1 It has ordered Clairol...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases