RUSHTON v. TOBLER

No. 5730.

457 P.2d 584 (1969)

Harold and Nola RUSHTON, Appellants, v. Wendell TOBLER, Individually, and D & W Equipment Leasing Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

August 4, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward G. Marshall, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Bell & Morris and Daryl Engebregson, Las Vegas, for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This is a contract action in which the plaintiffs request specific performance of a contract to purchase a bakery business, damages, and other relief. The cause was tried to a jury. After the plaintiffs had completed the presentation of their evidence, the district court granted the defendants' Rule 41(b) motion to dismiss believing that a sufficient case had not been made for jury resolution. This appeal is from that ruling. The posture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases