Per Curiam.
The defendant in this simple contract action, about 11 months after the filing of the note of issue, moved to amend his answer so as to plead the Statute of Frauds. Almost one year previously he had been served with plaintiff's bill of particulars which stated, in response to his demand, that the contract was oral. At that time he was still entitled to serve an amended answer without permission. The motion was granted but neither then nor at any...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
