UNITED STATES v. MENDENHALL

No. 24192.

421 F.2d 588 (1969)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Stanford MENDENHALL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

December 23, 1969.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Edward Morgan, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.

Jo Ann D. Diamos, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Appellant voluntarily and knowingly entered a guilty plea to a charge of violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a). He was sentenced to two years in the custody of the Attorney General, a sentence authorized by 26 U.S.C. § 7237(a). Appellant's contention on appeal that his sentence is invalid because the trial judge made use of a sentencing report prepared by an out-of-state probation officer and which contained alleged errors is without merit. No objection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases