1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 306 F.Supp.
  5. 306 F.Supp. 699 (1969)
 

AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION v. AO INDUSTRIES, INC.

Civ. 1969-179.

306 F.Supp. 699 (1969)

AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AO INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court W. D. New York.

October 20, 1969.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jaeckle, Fleischmann, Kelly, Swart & Augspurger, Buffalo, N. Y. (John H. Stenger, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), Amster & Rothstein, New York City (Morton Amster, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, N. Y. (Robert M. Hitchcock, Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), Finnegan, Henderson & Farabow, Washington, D. C. (Ford F. Farabow, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.

CURTIN, District Judge.

By order dated September 16, 1969, this court directed the defendant to show cause why it should not be cited for contempt of the preliminary injunction issued on June 6, 1969.

Plaintiff complains that one of defendant's subsidiaries is distributing the 1968 Annual Report of AO Industries, Inc. together with other sales promotional literature of its subsidiary, in clear violation of the preliminary injunction which states:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases