1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 51 N.J.
  5. 51 N.J. 48 (1968)
 

DE VIVO v. SIMPKSON

51 N.J. 48 (1968)

237 A.2d 617

AMEDO DE VIVO AND ELIZABETH DE VIVO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHNNY SIMPKSON, JR. AND EDITH ASKEN, A/K/A EDITH ASKEW, DEFENDANTS, AND JUNE STRELECKI, DIRECTOR OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 22, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael D. Varbalow for appellants (Mr. Michael N. Kouvatas, attorney).

Mr. James J. Casby, Jr., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO, and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases