Unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered on the law and the facts, with costs in all courts to abide the event.
Error there was in the Judge's charge when he asserted that a finding of "vandalism" under the policy could be made even though the property destroyed and for which recovery was sought was destroyed "in some manner without any wilful or malicious act" accentuating a right of recovery even if there was no willful or malicious intent. The policy specifically...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
