TUNISON v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY


445 P.2d 498 (1968)

In the matter of the Relocation and Widening of a Portion of N.E. Columbia Boulevard, No. 3824. Basil A. TUNISON and Donna E. Tunison, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided October 2, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Evans, Deputy Dist. Atty., Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was George Van Hoomissen, Dist. Atty., Portland.

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Norman Kobin and Kobin & Meyer, Portland.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and MENGLER, JJ.


O'CONNELL, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant Multnomah county from a judgment on a verdict awarding damages to plaintiffs in an eminent domain proceeding.

Plaintiffs were owners of property fronting on N.E. Columbia Boulevard. The property was leased to Clarence Wilson and was used by him for the construction and sale of heavy industrial equipment in Portland. Defendant took by condemnation a part of the property consisting of a 25-foot frontage strip...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases