OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Defendant has pled guilty to the crime of receiving stolen property in violation of Minn.St. 609.53. He appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate the conviction and for leave to enter a plea of not guilty. The issue is whether the record supports a finding that defendant was aware of his rights with respect to search and seizure and if so, whether he intelligently waived them.
On July 8, 1964, defendant was advised that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.