1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 399 F.2d
  5. 399 F.2d 511 (1968)
 

VALLEY VISION, INC. v. F. C. C.

Nos. 21869, 21870 and 21870-A.

399 F.2d 511 (1968)

VALLEY VISION, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents (two cases). VALLEY VISION, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 27, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lauren A. Colby (argued), Gennaro D. Caliendo, Washington, D. C., Halley, Head, LaForce & Moorad, Modesto, Cal., for petitioners.

John H. Conlin (argued), Koteen & Burt, Covington & Burling, Howard E. Shapiro, Acting Chief, App. Section, Henry Geller, Gen. Counsel, F. C. C., Wm. Fishman, Atty. F. C. C., Ramsey Clark, Atty. Gen. of U. S., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HAMLIN, DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges.

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

Valley Vision, Inc. (Valley) operates a community antenna television system (CATV) at Placerville, California. It began operations on September 30, 1966. It brings to its subscribers the signals of television stations in Sacramento, San Francisco, Modesto, and Chico, California. On February 17, 1967, the Federal Communications Commission issued an order directing Valley to show cause why it should not be ordered to cease and desist from extending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases