1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 74 Wn.2d
  5. 74 Wn.2d 814 (1968)
 

KEOUGH v. KITTLEMAN

No. 40316.

74 Wn.2d 814 (1968)

447 P.2d 77

JOHN J. KEOUGH et al., Appellants, v. HARRY F. KITTLEMAN et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

November 7, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MacDonald, Hoague & Bayless and Kenneth A. MacDonald, for appellants.

Karr, Tuttle, Campbell, Koch & Campbell, Coleman P. Hall, Mont Clair Spear, Beresford & Booth, by Robert O. Beresford, and Allen, DeGarmo & Leedy, by George Leedy, for respondents.

HILL, J.

Quaere: Where depositors in a savings and loan association have given voting proxies to the board of directors,1 can a majority of the board determine how the proxies are to be exercised, or must the members of the board concur unanimously in the exercise of the proxies?

[1] Answer: Absent clear evidence of an intention to the contrary, a majority of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases