1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 73 Wn.2d
  5. 73 Wn.2d 796 (1968)
 

HAYES v. HULSWIT

No. 38992.

73 Wn.2d 796 (1968)

440 P.2d 849

ADA E. HAYES, Appellant, v. FRANKLIN F. HULSWIT et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

May 9, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horton & Wilkins, for appellant.

Robert A. Morrow (of Karr, Tuttle, Campbell, Koch & Granberg), for respondents.

WEAVER, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her action entered after the court had sustained a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.

[1] We are mindful of the oft-quoted rule that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence admits the truth of the opposing party's evidence, and all inferences that can reasonably be drawn therefrom, and requires that the evidence be interpreted most...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases