Assuming that the court had the power to dismiss the second amended claims, such would be discretionary and the State has shown no abuse of such discretion. Accordingly, the second order must be affirmed if the first order was correct. Under the procedure in the Court of Claims the State need not file any answer to a claim and for procedural purposes the claim is deemed controverted in all material respects. In the present case the claimants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
