1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 208 So.2d
  5. 208 So.2d 629 (1968)
 

HIDALGO v. STATE

No. 66-769.

208 So.2d 629 (1968)

Richard Roy HIDALGO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 2, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, Phillip A. Hubbart and Marvin J. Emory, Jr., Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The record of appellant's conviction fails to support the judgment and sentence because of the State's failure to prove an essential element of the crime charged. See § 811.20 Fla. Stat. (1965), F.S.A. The State, in its brief and upon oral argument, recognizes the fatal deficiency. Therefore, the judgment and sentence must be reversed upon authority of the law as established in Lasher v. State, 80 Fla. 712...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases