1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 289 F.Supp.
  5. 289 F.Supp. 533 (1968)
 

HAMMOND LEAD PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES

C. D. 3552; Protest No. 67/77548.

289 F.Supp. 533 (1968)

HAMMOND LEAD PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES (Ralph Valls, Party-in-Interest).

United States Customs Court, First Division.

September 11, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alvord & Alvord, Washington, D. C. (Albert H. Greene, Washington, D. C., of counsel) for plaintiff.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (Brian S. Goldstein, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant.

Chapman, DiSalle & Friedman, Washington, D. C. (Paul A. Lenzini, Washington, D. C., of counsel) for party-in-interest.

Before WATSON and MALETZ, Judges.

MALETZ, Judge:

This is a protest by an American manufacturer under section 516(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U. S.C. § 1516(b)). The protest challenges the finding of the Secretary of the Treasury that no bounty or grant, as defined in section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1303), had been paid or bestowed by the Mexican Government upon certain litharge1 that was

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases