BURGDORFER ELECTRIC CO. v. VOYLES CONSTRUCTION CO.

Nos. 32844, 32845.

432 S.W.2d 387 (1968)

BURGDORFER ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. VOYLES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Respondent, and Henry B. Classe and Helma Classe, Defendants-Respondents.

St. Louis Court of Appeals, Missouri.

September 17, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Klamen & Weisman, Marvin Klamen, Clayton, for defendant-appellant-respondent.

Daniel P. Reardon and James K. Pendleton, St. Louis, for plaintiff-respondent-appellant.


CLEMENS, Commissioner.

This mechanic's lien case hinges on two issues: In proving a contract, may a party rely on his adversary's testimony of the agreed amount when that amount differs from his own testimony? And, is the dismissal of an original petition res judicata when the court does not then give plaintiff leave to amend?

Plaintiff (Burgdorfer), an electrical contracting company, got an $8,000 verdict and judgment against the corporate builder (Voyles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases