Claimant was employed in New York by the appellant, a Connecticut corporation with an office in New York City which furnished undercover operators to work in its client's places of business. Claimant was given brief training in New York and sent to work for a client in Pennsylvania. He was paid by the client in the same manner as other similar employees of the client and in addition received a differential from the appellant to bring his...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
