1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 240 A.2d
  5. 240 A.2d 577 (1968)
 

GOLDMAN v. BRAUNSTEIN'S, INC.

240 A.2d 577 (1968)

Carl I. GOLDMAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. BRAUNSTEIN'S, INC., Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

March 25, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore F. Sandstrom, of Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellant.

Charles K. Keil, of Bayard, Brill & Handelman, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellee.

WOLCOTT, C. J., CAREY, J., and DUFFY, Chancellor, sitting.

CAREY, Justice:

The plaintiff below, Carl I. Goldman, has appealed from an order granting summary judgment entered by the Superior Court in favor of Braunstein's, Inc., defendant below. The issue we must decide is: Is the limitation of time for starting a suit to recover damages for breach of an employment contract governed by T. 10 Del.C. § 8110 (one year) or by T. 10 Del.C. § 8106 (three years)?

The facts pertinent to the present dispute are these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases