1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 389 F.2d
  5. 389 F.2d 389 (1968)
 

JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF MARYLAND, INC. v. UNITED STATES

No. 11569.

389 F.2d 389 (1968)

JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF MARYLAND, INC., a Maryland Corporation, and Jules Hairstylists, Inc., a District of Columbia Corporation, and Jules Hairstylists of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America and Irving Machiz, appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided January 12, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry S. Shapiro, Baltimore, Md., for appellants.

Karl Schmeidler, Attorney, Department of Justice (Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Crombie J. D. Garrett, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Stephen H. Sachs, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellees.

Before BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the district court.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases