MEYER v. STATE

No. State 92.

40 Wis.2d 736 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 608

MEYER, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 26, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Lucareli, Newman & Ungemach of Kenosha, and oral argument by V. J. Lucareli.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Sverre O. Tinglum, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Joseph B. Molinaro, district attorney of Kenosha county.


HANLEY, J.

Defendant contends that the lack of counsel at the time of sentencing, absent an intelligent waiver thereof on the record, requires a vacation of the sentences imposed.

Defendant expressly waived his right to counsel at the time of his appearance before the magistrate on the Jefferson School Annex burglary charge (No. 8717, below). He reiterated the waiver at his arraignment. The efficacy and validity of these waivers are not challenged by defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases