OPINION PER CURIAM, November 27, 1968:
Appellant claims that he was not represented by counsel at trial and that he did not make a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel. Appellant was told only that he was "entitled to counsel" and was not told that he could have free counsel if indigent. This advice was inadequate. See Commonwealth v. Ritchey,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.