EASTHAM v. YOUNG

[No. 300, September Term, 1967.]

250 Md. 516 (1968)

243 A.2d 559

EASTHAM v. YOUNG

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for rehearing or in alternative to amend mandate filed July 18, 1968.

Motion for rehearing denied and mandate amended July 29, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl G. Feissner, with whom was William L. Kaplan on the brief, for appellant.

Submitted on brief by Herbert D. Morrison and Samuel M. Ivrey for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.


HAMMOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mrs. Eastham, a resident of Montgomery County, complains that she can not be sued in Anne Arundel County, as the trial court held she could be, to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate she owned in Anne Arundel County, and furniture and garden and boating equipment thereon, and asks us to free her from the toils of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County.

Reversal is sought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases