PICKARD v. BURLINGTON BELT CORPORATION

No. 68SC209.

162 S.E.2d 601 (1968)

2 N.C. App. 97

Glenn M. PICKARD and wife Mary Ellen Pickard, and Edgar M. Murray v. BURLINGTON BELT CORPORATION, a corporation, Clark Building Company, a corporation, and T. & J. Construction Company, Inc., a corporation. BURLINGTON BELT CORPORATION, Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company, New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. CLARK BUILDING COMPANY, and T. & J. Construction Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 14, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter, by Norman B. Smith and McNeill Smith, Greensboro, for Glenn M. Pickard, Mary Ellen Pickard, and Edgar M. Murray, plaintiffs-appellants (Case No. 1).

Jordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols, by Luke Wright, Greensboro, for Burlington Belt Corporation et al., plaintiffs-appellants (Case No. 2).

Sanders & Holt, by W. Clary Holt, and and R. Chase Raiford, Burlington, for Burlington Belt Corporation, defendant-appellee (Case No. 1).

Hoyle, Boone, Dees & Johnson, by E. E. Boone, Jr., Greensboro, Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, by Hugh L. Lobdell and J. Donnell Lassiter, Charlotte, for Clark Building Co., defendant-appellee (Cases Nos. 1 and 2).

Haworth, Riggs, Kuhn & Haworth, by John Haworth and Walter W. Baker, Jr., High Point, for T. & J. Construction Co., defendant-appellee (Cases Nos. 1 and 2).


BROCK, Judge.

Case No. 1

Without detailing all of the specifications of negligence, the Pickards and Murray seek to hold T. & J. Construction Company liable for damages upon the grounds that it violated G.S. § 14-136, that it violated G.S. § 14-140, that it was negligent in burning the field on a windy day, and that it failed to exercise due care in controlling the fire. They seek to hold Clark Building Company liable for damages upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases