1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 283 F.Supp.
  5. 283 F.Supp. 476 (1968)
 

RICHARDS v. SWANSON

No. 63 Civ. 2761 and 2762.

283 F.Supp. 476 (1968)

William RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. Roger SWANSON and the City of New York, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

April 19, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joy & Hallinan, New York City, by C. Joseph Hallinan, Jr., New York City, for plaintiff.

J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel, by Richard A. Hagen, Asst. Corporation Counsel, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

POLLACK, District Judge.

This is a motion for a new trial by the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants.

The specific grounds for plaintiff's motion are that evidence was erroneously excluded and plaintiff's opening statement was improperly curtailed. On the oral argument of the motion, it was conceded that the questioned rulings relate to discretionary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases