Respondent does not deny that the appellant rendered legal services in the action but asserts that the retainer arrangement was on a contingent basis. The former attorney denies this but fails to state what his arrangement was with the plaintiff basing his opposition to the motion on his blanket denial of a contingent fee arrangement, without disclosing any basis for the amount he seeks. No hearing was sought by the appellant. An examination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
