1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 163 N.W.2d
  5. 163 N.W.2d 567 (1968)
 

KLOOS v. SOO LINE RAILROAD

No. 41169.

163 N.W.2d 567 (1968)

Lawrence KLOOS, et al., Appellants, v. SOO LINE RAILROAD, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 13, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufer, Blatti, Hefte, Pemberton & Schulze, Fergus Falls, Richard S. Roberts, Morris, for appellants.

Donohue & Donohue, St. Cloud, for respondents.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and OTIS, ROGOSHESKE, SHERAN and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

PETERSON, Justice.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, appeal from the second of two orders denying their post-trial motions for a new trial. We do not reach the merits of the order, however, because we must hold that this order is not appealable.

On November 8, 1966, plaintiffs moved on the minutes of the court for a new trial. The motion was directed to the inadequacy of the jury's award of damages, the grounds for the motion being that the verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases