1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 390 F.2d
  5. 390 F.2d 338 (1968)
 

SIGNAL OIL AND GAS COMPANY v. N. L. R. B.

No. 21745.

390 F.2d 338 (1968)

SIGNAL OIL AND GAS COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 4, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman G. Kuch, Los Angeles (argued), A. E. Stebbings, Harold Judson, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Abraham Siegel, Washington, D. C. (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, H. M. Levy, Eugene B. Granof, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Ralph E. Kennedy, Director, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and HILL, District Judge.

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us pursuant to sections 10(e) and 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 160(e), (f) (1964), which authorize our review of final orders of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board ruled on August 24, 1966, that the Signal Oil and Gas Company had violated sections 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a) (1), (a) (3) (1964),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases