BORNEO SUMATRA TRADING CO. v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 3280; Protest 59/17126-24353-58.

279 F.Supp. 443 (1968)

BORNEO SUMATRA TRADING CO., Inc. v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, First Division.

February 7, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, New York City (Murray Sklaroff and David Serko, New York City, of Counsel), for plaintiff.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (Glenn E. Harris, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant.

Before WATSON and BECKWORTH, Judges.


WATSON, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain woven fabrics, weighing over 4 ounces per square yard, containing more than 17 percent by weight, but not in chief value of wool, the remainder of the fabrics being composed of manmade fibers.

The fabrics in question were classified under the provisions of paragraph 1122 of the Tariff Act of 1930, classification under said paragraph not being in dispute. On liquidation, the collector assessed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases