PER CURIAM.
The defendants contend that certain items which were admitted into evidence over their objections were the product of a search and seizure made subsequent to an unlawful arrest and therefore were inadmissible at trial.
Several times before this court has upheld arrests made pursuant to Florida's vagrancy statute. See Echols v. State, Fla. App. 1967,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.