The board has determined that the claimant was overpaid $1,300 in benefits, based on a finding of ineligibility because her services as a receptionist were performed for her husband and thus not within the definition of required "employment". (Labor Law, § 511, subd. 7.) Additionally, the board has found that claimant willfully filed a false statement when she gave as the reason for her loss of employment "Slow season No work". The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.