Appellants' sole contention is that there is no substantial evidence supportive of the award. They assert, in particular, that the medical evidence (including that adduced from claimant's own physicians) is that claimant's disability during the period of the award was due to conditions unrelated to the 1962 accident, these including a chronic lung disease. The board's decision, however, specifically notes the report of minimal partial disability...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
