EPSTEIN v. SOLITRON DEVICES, INC.

No. 263, Docket 31119.

388 F.2d 310 (1968)

Nathan EPSTEIN, under a Power of Trust for the benefit of Allen Lee Epstein, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SOLITRON DEVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and William Kearns et al., Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided January 11, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome J. Londin, New York City (Carro, Spanbock & Londin, Holtzmann, Wise & Shepard, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

Stanley L. Kaufman, New York City (Kaufman, Taylor, Kimmel & Miller, Shephard S. Miller, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the order of the Southern District denying a motion by Order to Show Cause by Solitron Devices, Inc., for an order directing plaintiff in a stockholder derivative action alleging violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to post security for expenses pursuant to Section 627 of the New York Business Corporation Law, McKinneys's Consol.Laws, c. 4, for the reasons stated in Judge Bonsal's opinion. Weitzen v. Kearns, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases