1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 265 Cal.App.2d
  5. 265 Cal.App.2d 408 (1968)
 

U.S. CAP & CLOSURE, INC. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No 33086.

265 Cal.App.2d 408 (1968)

71 Cal. Rptr. 184

U.S. CAP & CLOSURE, INC., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; PRESSURE DISPENSERS, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

August 30, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard S. Knox, Christie, Parker & Hale and Edwin L. Hartz for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Hastings, Blanchard & Hastings, James H. Hastings and Robert G. Blanchard for Real Party in Interest.

COBEY, Acting P.J.

This case comes before us upon a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to quash the substituted service of summons and complaint upon petitioner, an Illinois corporation1 which has never qualified to do business in California. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 416.3.) This service was effectuated pursuant to Corporations Code, section 6408, in an action for breach of a license

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases