Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the conviction of grand larceny in the second degree to petit larceny and by reducing the sentence to the time served. As so modified, judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, there was absolutely no proof that the stolen article had a market value of more than $100 (see Penal Law [1909], § 1305; People v. Harold,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.