1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 156 Conn.
  5. 156 Conn. 500 (1968)
 

FRUCHTMAN v. MANNING

156 Conn. 500 (1968)

MILDRED FRUCHTMAN v. CYRUS MANNING ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 28, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theodore A. Lubinsky, for the appellant (named defendant).

Richard P. Heffernan, with whom was James E. Heffernan, Jr., for the appellee (plaintiff).

KING, C. J., ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM and RYAN, JS.

ALCORN, J.

The defendant Cyrus Manning is the son of the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought this action against him and his wife, Natalie Manning, alleging that the plaintiff had withdrawn $9000 from her bank account in Brooklyn, New York, and had delivered that sum to Cyrus in reliance on his representation that the interest rates paid by Connecticut banks were higher than those paid by New York banks, that it would be safer for her to withdraw the sum from her account...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases