Judgment herein appealed from, affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party.
Plaintiff did not establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant bank either in the application of the wax or the maintenance of the floor. Nor did plaintiff show that defendant bank had prior notice or should have known of the alleged dangerous condition created by the waxing of the floor done by the third party defendant pursuant to an employment contract. (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.