1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 40 Wis.2d
  5. 40 Wis.2d 607 (1968)
 

STATE v. BEAL

No. State 19.

40 Wis.2d 607 (1968)

162 N.W.2d 640

STATE, Respondent, v. BEAL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 26, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Morse, Morse & Roggensack of Lancaster, and oral argument by R. R. Roggensack and E. J. Morse, Jr.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and James B. Halferty, district attorney of Grant county.

CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

The defendant presents four issues on this appeal.

(1) Whether the motion to suppress the evidence should have been granted because the complaint for the search warrant was based on hearsay?

(2) Whether the issuance of the search warrant was predicated on future acts or contingencies?

(3) Whether the inspection of the parcel at the post office constituted an unreasonable search...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases