1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 610 (1968)
 

LISOWSKI v. CHENENOFF

37 Wis.2d 610 (1968)

LISOWSKI, Respondent, v. CHENENOFF, d/b/a NICK CHENENOFF CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 30, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Phillip Markey of Milwaukee, attorney, and Wayne W. Schlosser of Sheboygan of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Schlosser.

For the respondent there was a brief by Grootemat, Cook & Franke, attorneys, and Robert E. Cook and Thomas J. Drought of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert E. Cook.

WILKIE, J.

Both sides seek to have this court overturn what the trial court has done after patiently bringing this lawsit to judgment, the defendant claiming a perverse jury and numerous court errors that command a new trial, the plaintiff seeking to restore the substantially reduced items of damage in the original verdict. For purposes of our discussion we will first consider the contentions of the defendant and then the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases