HOWARD v. N.J. BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.,


51 N.J. 594 (1968)

242 A.2d 622

HOWARD AND DORA DIAMOND T/A MORRISTOWN PICTURE FRAME AND GLASS COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, (A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), AND GRAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 20, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John S. Donington argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Weiner, Weiner & Glennon, attorneys; Mr. Donington, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Joel A. Murphy argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Mills, Doyle & Muir, attorneys; Mr. Murphy, of counsel and on the brief).


The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.

This case requires another examination of when a cause of action "accrues" for statute of limitations purposes. See also New Market Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Fellows, 51 N.J. 419 (1968); Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick, 51 N.J. 130 (1968); Fernandi v. Strully, 35 N.J. 434 (1961).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases