1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 400 F.2d
  5. 400 F.2d 237 (1968)
 

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. v. FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF N. Y.

Nos. 21730, 21730-A.

400 F.2d 237 (1968)

NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO., a corporation, Appellant, v. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a corporation, Appellee. FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, a corporation, Appellant, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO., a corporation, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

August 30, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Stoeve (argued), Brian B. Kennedy (argued), of Turner, Stoeve & Layman, Spokane, Wash., for appellant.

Joseph J. Rekofke (argued), of Cashatt, Williams, Connelly & Rekofke, Spokane, Wash., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG, and ELY, Circuit Judges.

ELY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a question of the interrelation of two insurance policies, one issued by New Amsterdam Casualty Company [New Amsterdam] and the other by Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York [Fidelity]. Both policies contain provisions that certain coverage shall be the "excess over any other valid and collectible insurance." In an action for declaratory relief, New Amsterdam contended that the applicable provisions of the two policies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases