The loss of plaintiffs' property was from an automobile which at the time the loss occurred did not have "actually in or upon such vehicle" the designated custodian. Hence defendants are not liable, because the actual loss occurred under circumstances falling squarely within the exclusory clause. The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
Order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
