Mr. Chief Justice HARNSBERGER delivered the opinion of the court.
Arnold appeals from a judgment against him and in favor of Gibson in the sum of $475 and costs in an action upon contract for the recovery of rental use of Gibson's equipment by Arnold.
The evidence sufficiently shows (1) that Gibson owned a dirt-moving equipment; (2) the parties agreed that Gibson would take his equipment to the site of Arnold's drilling operation for Arnold's and his employees...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
