1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 249 Md.
  5. 249 Md. 351 (1968)
 

APEX EXPRESS INC. v. BAICOVITZ

[Nos. 167 and 170, September Term, 1967.]

249 Md. 351 (1968)

240 A.2d 106

APEX EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. BAICOVITZ, ETC. APEX EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. RESNICK

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 1, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel S. Smalkin, with whom were Rollins, Smalkin, Weston & Andrew; Ginsberg & Ginsberg and Hyman Ginsberg on the briefs, for appellants.

Joseph I. Pines, with whom were Max R. Israelson and Samuel O. Jackson, Jr., on the briefs, for appellees.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, BARNES, FINAN and SINGLEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

These appeals in related cases, argued together, are from the refusal of Judge Foster in No. 167 and Judge Barrett in No. 170 to permit the appellants to implead a third party defendant long after — in one case several years — the expiration of the thirty-day period in which a defendant can summons a third party defendant as a matter of right under Maryland Rule 315 a and b. Under that Rule (paragraph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases