FOGLEMAN, Justice.
Appellant Meyer contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting appellee's motion for a new trial on the ground that the jury verdict in this case was against the preponderance of the evidence. The circuit judge relied on Ark. Stat.Ann. § 27-1901 (Repl.1962), which states that a new trial may be granted for the cause, among others, that the verdict or decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence. Appellant contends that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.