1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 99 N.J.
  5. 99 N.J. Super. 493 (1968)
 

CORPORATE DEV. SPEC. INC. v. WARREN-TEED PHARM.

99 N.J. Super. 493 (1968)

240 A.2d 450

CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WARREN-TEED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 11, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mark D. Larner argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Budd, Larner, Kent & Gross, attorneys).

Mr. Michael F. Spicer argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Jamieson, Walsh, McCardell & Moore, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment setting aside service of process and dismissing its action against defendant on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of this State over the defendant, which is a foreign corporation not registered here.

Present here is a fairly closely balanced question of mixed law and fact as to whether defendant's contacts with the State of New Jersey, both including and apart from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases