1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 210 So.2d
  5. 210 So.2d 375 (1968)
 

MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY v. FRUGE

No. 2251.

210 So.2d 375 (1968)

MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eula Mae FRUGE, Defendant-Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwards, Edwards & Broadhurst, by William C. Broadhurst, Crowley, and Shotwell, Brown & Sperry, by Burt W. Sperry, Monroe, for plaintiff-appellant.

Pugh, Buatt, Landry & Pugh, by Lawrence G. Pugh, Jr., Crowley, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGE, HOOD and CULPEPPER, JJ.

FRUGE, Judge.

This case was consolidated with the cases of Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 378 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968), and Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company v. Hebert, 210 So.2d 379 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968).

Plaintiff in each of these cases seeks to expropriate a permanent servitude across the defendants' property for the construction of a twenty-six inch high...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases