1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 278 F.Supp.
  5. 278 F.Supp. 298 (1968)
 

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS v. UNITED STATES

Protest 64/15096-3448; C.D. 3248.

278 F.Supp. 298 (1968)

CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAYS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Customs Court Second Division.

January 11, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (Joseph Schwartz and Earl R. Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City (Bernard J. Babb, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant.

Before RAO and FORD, JJ.

RAO, Chief Judge:

Certain articles designated as "rail anchors" were classified for customs duty purposes upon importation into the United States as articles or wares, composed in chief value of iron or steel, not specially provided for, within the purview of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas.Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and were assessed with duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases