1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 394 F.2d
  5. 394 F.2d 160 (1968)
 

MARITIME SERVICE COMMITTEE, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, AFL-CIO

Nos. 16679-16681, 16685.

394 F.2d 160 (1968)

MARITIME SERVICE COMMITTEE, INC., Farrell Lines, Inc., Grace Line, Inc., Gulf & South American Steamship Co., Inc., Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Marine Transport Lines, Inc., Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. and United States Lines, Inc., v. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, AFL-CIO, Appellant. TANKER SERVICE COMMITTEE, INC. et al. v. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, AFL-CIO, Appellant. AMERICAN MARITIME ASSOCIATION, v. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots Local 14, Lloyd W. Sheldon, Thomas F. O'Callaghan, Moe Weinstein and John Handley, Appellants. AMERICAN MARITIME ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots Local 14, Lloyd W. Sheldon, Thomas F. O'Callaghan, Moe Weinstein and John Handley.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided May 10, 1968.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin Schwartz, Schwartz & O'Connell, New York City (Wilderman, Markowitz & Kirschner, Richard H. Markowitz, Richard Kirschner, Philadelphia, Pa., Burton Epstein, New York City, on the brief), for appellants in Nos. 16679, 16680, 16681 and for appellees in No. 16685.

Eugene R. Lippman, Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Joseph M. Gindhart, Philadelphia, Pa., Albert E. Rice, New York City, on the brief), for appellants in No. 16685 and for appellee in No. 16681.

Morton M. Maneker, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City (Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Edward Silver, Randall M. Odza, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees in Nos. 16679 and 16680.

Before KALODNER, GANEY and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Events which have transpired since the entry of the Orders appealed from at Appeals Nos. 16679, 16680 and 16685 establish beyond question that the questions they present have become moot and these appeals will be dismissed for that reason.

The Appeal at No. 16681 is from the entry of an Order which is clearly interlocutory and it will be dismissed for the reason that it is not an appealable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases