PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GREER

Civ. A. No. 68-251.

289 F.Supp. 261 (1968)

PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Michael D. GREER, Donald D. Greer, Terrance Greer, Eugene Malcolm Wright, E. M. Wright, Betty P. Chapman as Administratrix of the Estate of Gary Ballew, Betty P. Chapman as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles A. Ballew, Debbie I. Thackston, Ira Thackston, and Ira Thackston as Administrator of the Estate of Tammy Elizabeth Thackston, Defendants. Ira THACKSTON, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Michael D. GREER, Donald D. Greer, and Terrance Greer, Third-Party Defendants. Debbie I. THACKSTON, by her Guardian ad Litem, Ira Thackston, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Michael D. GREER, Donald D. Greer, and Terrance Greer, Third-Party Defendants. Ira THACKSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of Tammy Elizabeth Thackston, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Michael D. GREER, Donald D. Greer and Terrance Greer, Third-Party Defendants. Ira THACKSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of Tammy Elizabeth Thackston, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Donald D. GREER, Terrance Greer and Michael D. Greer, Third-Party Defendants.

United States District Court D. South Carolina, Greenville Division.

September 4, 1968.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. G. Calhoun, Jr., Greenville, S. C., for plaintiff.

Calhoun H. Turner and Herman Cox, Greenville, S. C., for defendants Michael D. Greer, by his Guardian ad Litem Terrance Greer, Donald D. Greer and Terrance Greer.

William B. Price, Greenville, S. C., for defendants Betty P. Chapman, as Admx. of the Est. of Charles A. Ballew and Betty P. Chapman, as Admr.

Rodney A. Culbertson, Greenville, S. C., for defendants. Debbie I. Thackston, Ira Thackston and Ira Thackston, as Admr.


OPINION and ORDER

DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.

This is an interpleader action, filed under Rule 22(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,1 by an insurance carrier of limited liability, against its assured, the assured's son, and five claimants who assert claims of substantial amounts against the assured as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident for which it is alleged the assured and his son are liable. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases